Ενδιαφέρουσες αποφάσεις για το α. 6 ΕΣΔΑ περί ευθυδικίας αναφορικά με την αμεροληψία των δικαστών εξέδωσε το ΕΔΔΑ
Pečnik v. Slovenia (no. 44901/05): Δικηγόρος καταδικάστηκε για ασέβεια προς το δικαστήριο, από τον ίδιο δικαστή που στηλίτευσε μέσω του δικογράφου της εφέσεως.
The applicant, Alenka Pečnik, is a Slovenian national who was born in 1956 and lives in Celje. A lawyer, she was fined for contempt of court in January 2002 for criticising in an appeal statement the judge who had rejected her client’s claim for injuries sustained
during an attack.
The applicant, Alenka Pečnik, is a Slovenian national who was born in 1956 and lives in Celje. A lawyer, she was fined for contempt of court in January 2002 for criticising in an appeal statement the judge who had rejected her client’s claim for injuries sustained
during an attack.
Relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), she complained that her right to an impartial tribunal had been violated since the judge she had criticised also had convicted her of contempt of court.
Violation of Article 6 § 1
Just satisfaction: EUR 4,000 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 980 (costs and expenses)
Peruš v. Slovenia (no. 35016/05): Ο ίδιος δικαστής συμμετείχε και στη πρωτοβάθμια και στη δευτεροβάθμια δίκη
The applicant, Norbert Peruš, is a Slovenian national who was born in 1940 and lives in Slovenska Bistrica. The case concerned proceedings he had brought before the labour courts, requesting in particular the annulment of a decision to transfer him to a different post in the electro-installation company where he was employed. The Slovenian courts dismissed his claims in a decision which became final in March 2005. Relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), he complained in particular that one of the judges
involved in the appeal proceedings had not been impartial because of his prior involvement in the case as a judge at a lower-instance court.
Violation of Article 6 § 1
The applicant, Norbert Peruš, is a Slovenian national who was born in 1940 and lives in Slovenska Bistrica. The case concerned proceedings he had brought before the labour courts, requesting in particular the annulment of a decision to transfer him to a different post in the electro-installation company where he was employed. The Slovenian courts dismissed his claims in a decision which became final in March 2005. Relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), he complained in particular that one of the judges
involved in the appeal proceedings had not been impartial because of his prior involvement in the case as a judge at a lower-instance court.
Violation of Article 6 § 1
Just satisfaction: EUR 5,000 (non-pecuniary damage)
πηγη: ethemis
=========
ΑΝΑΓΝΩΣΤΗΣ
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Θα θέλαμε να σας ενημερώσουμε, αναφορικά με τα σχόλια που δημοσιεύονται ότι:
1) Δε θα δημοσιεύονται δυσφημιστικά και εξυβριστικά σχόλια
2) Δε θα δημοσιεύονται ΑΣΧΕΤΑ σχόλια σε ΑΣΧΕΤΕΣ αναρτήσεις
3) Δε θα δημοσιεύονται επαναλαμβανόμενα σχόλια στην ίδια ανάρτηση
4) Δε θα δημοσιεύονται σχόλια σε Greeklish
5) Σχόλια σε ενυπόγραφα άρθρα θα δημοσιεύονται μόνον εφόσον και αυτά είναι ενυπόγραφα.
6) Σχόλια σε ενυπόγραφο σχόλιο θα δημοσιεύονται μόνον εφόσον και αυτά είναι ενυπόγραφα.
7) ΤΑ ΣΧΟΛΙΑ ΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΟΝΤΑΙ ΜΟΝΟ ΣΤΙΣ ΑΝΑΡΤΗΣΕΙΣ ΠΟΥ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΣΗΜΑΝΣΗ "ΕΠΙΤΡΕΠΟΝΤΑΙ ΣΧΟΛΙΑ"
Η ΑΝΑΡΤΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΣΧΟΛΙΩΝ ΔΕ ΣΗΜΑΙΝΕΙ ΟΤΙ ΥΙΟΘΕΤΟΥΝΤΑΙ ΑΠΌ ΤΗ ΔΙΑΧΕΙΡΙΣΗ